0

Tool Verification for Test-Time Reinforcement Learning

Test-time reinforcement learning (TTRL) has emerged as a promising paradigm for Recursive Self-Improving AI (RSI) by adapting Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) on unlabeled test inputs, using self-consensus rewards derived from majority voting over sampled rollouts.

Preview
Year
2026
Venue
arXiv 2026
Authors
7
Hosting
Abstract onlyARXIV-DEFAULT

Cite

Notes

Only stored in your browser.

Attribution

Abstract & full text
arxiv.org/abs/2603.02203ARXIV-DEFAULT
TL;DR
Semantic Scholar
Attribution policy →

Abstract

Test-time reinforcement learning (TTRL) has emerged as a promising paradigm for Recursive Self-Improving AI (RSI) by adapting Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) on unlabeled test inputs, using self-consensus rewards derived from majority voting over sampled rollouts. However, majority voting can mistake popularity for correctness: a spurious yet high-frequency unverified consensus may become a biased reward signal, causing test-time RL to reinforce frequent but wrong answers and collapse into an incorrect mode. We address this false-popular failure mode with T^3RL (Tool-Verification for Test-Time Reinforcement Learning), a verification-aware test-time RL framework. T^3RL grounds pseudo-label construction in external tool evidence. Concretely, a verifier utilizes external tool evidence (e.g., from code execution) to upweight verified rollouts during a verification-aware voting, producing more reliable pseudo-labels for training. Across various math difficulties (MATH-500, AMC, and AIME 2024) and diverse backbone families, T^3RL significantly improves over TTRL, with better performance on harder problems. T^3RL is positioned as a verified online data synthesizer, highlighting the role of tool verification in reliable online adaptation. T^3RL is extensible to verifiable domains and provides training and inference efficiency.

Authors

7