0

Claude Fable 5 vs GLM 5

Head to head on 18 shared benchmarks, with price, context window, and release dates.

Benchmark scores

51

evals · sort by any column, ⤢ to expand fullscreen

Model
Claude Fable 5

Anthropic

71.8%1933elo8392.6%55.5%63.5%81.4%78.6%80.0%59.9%88.5%93.9%87.3%60.2%76.9%62.9%90.4%98.5%17.4%83.9%38.6%90.0%-1340elo78.0%56.3%-29.3%-29.8%1932elo66.0%---13.3%-56.1%88.5%68.9%85.0%95.0%51.9%---80.3%-88.0%66.0%74.2%69.4%
GLM 5

Zai

62.9%1598elo70.966.6%7.6%55.2%71.2%73.6%67.9%55.3%77.5%83.5%69.1%38.3%70.0%39.4%23.4%97.4%----7.9%---24.7%-16.4%---97.982.7%48395-65.2%------73.369.7%72.8%-61.12---56.4%
2 / 2 models
AttributeClaude Fable 5

Anthropic

GLM 5

Zai

DescriptionClaude Fable 5 is Anthropic's most capable widely released model, built for the most demanding reasoning and long-horizon agentic work. Shares its base model with the invitation-only Claude Mythos 5.GLM-5 is an AI model from Zai, released with open weights.
FamilyClaudeGlm
Params--
Open weightsclosedopen
License-mit
Released9 Jun 202611 Feb 2026
Context1,000,000204,800
Input $/1M$10.00$1.00
Output $/1M$50.00$3.20
Cache read $/1M$1.000$0.120
Cache write $/1M$12.500-
Speed66 tok/s0 tok/s
Latency49.62 s0.00 s
Modalitiestext, image, filetext
Providers--
PublisherAnthropicZai
Reported scores
IFBench63.5% (AA)
LiveBench - Math93.9% (LiveBench)
LiveBench - Coding78.6% (LiveBench)

FAQ

Is Claude Fable 5 or GLM 5 better?
Across the 18 benchmarks both models report on Sophon, Claude Fable 5 leads on 18 of them. Which one is "better" depends on the benchmark - the table above shows every shared score.
How do Claude Fable 5 and GLM 5 compare on GPQA Diamond?
Claude Fable 5 scores 92.6% and GLM 5 scores 66.6% on GPQA Diamond.
Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5 or GLM 5?
GLM 5 is cheaper at $3.20 per million output tokens against $50.00 for Claude Fable 5 - about 15.6x.
When were Claude Fable 5 and GLM 5 released?
Claude Fable 5 was released 9 Jun 2026 by Anthropic. GLM 5 was released 11 Feb 2026 by Zai.

Comparing something else? Build your own side-by-side.