0

Self-Supervised Goal-Reaching Results in Multi-Agent Cooperation and Exploration

For groups of autonomous agents to achieve a particular goal, they must engage in coordination and long-horizon reasoning. Rather than relying on complex reward functions and explicit cooperation mechanisms, we ask what minimal ingredients are required for effective coordination…

Preview
Year
2025
Hosting
Abstract onlyARXIV-DEFAULT

Cite

Notes

Only stored in your browser.

Attribution

Abstract & full text
arxiv.org/abs/2509.10656ARXIV-DEFAULT
TL;DR
Semantic Scholar
Attribution policy →

Abstract

For groups of autonomous agents to achieve a particular goal, they must engage in coordination and long-horizon reasoning. Rather than relying on complex reward functions and explicit cooperation mechanisms, we ask what minimal ingredients are required for effective coordination and exploration to emerge in multi-agent settings. We investigate this question through self-supervised goal-reaching, where agents aim to maximize the likelihood of visiting a goal state rather than maximizing a reward. Despite a sparse feedback signal, we present empirical results that show self-supervised goal-reaching techniques enable agents to learn from such feedback. On MARL benchmarks, self-supervised goal-reaching outperforms alternative approaches that have access to the same sparse reward signal. Furthermore, we empirically demonstrate that multi-agent self-supervised goal-reaching approaches can be more robust than single-agent strategies. While there is no explicit exploration mechanism, this approach explores nontrivial intermediate coordination strategies in sparse settings where alternative approaches fail to achieve a single success.