0

Are Current Continual Learning Methods Truly Agnostic? Introducing OPRE, a Step Toward Agnostic Continual Learning

In order to achieve Continual Learning (CL), the problem of catastrophic forgetting, one that has plagued neural networks since their inception, must be overcome. The evaluation of continual learning methods relies on splitting a known homogeneous dataset and learning the…

Preview
Year
2025
Hosting
Abstract onlyARXIV-DEFAULT

Cite

Notes

Only stored in your browser.

Attribution

Abstract & full text
arxiv.org/abs/2511.08226ARXIV-DEFAULT
TL;DR
Semantic Scholar
Attribution policy →

Abstract

In order to achieve Continual Learning (CL), the problem of catastrophic forgetting, one that has plagued neural networks since their inception, must be overcome. The evaluation of continual learning methods relies on splitting a known homogeneous dataset and learning the associated tasks one after the other. We argue that most CL methods introduce a priori information about the data to come and cannot be considered agnostic. We exemplify this point with the case of methods relying on pretrained feature extractors, which are still used in CL. After showing that pretrained feature extractors imply a loss of generality with respect to the data that can be learned by the model, we then discuss other kinds of a priori information introduced in other CL methods. We then present the Online Patch Redundancy Eliminator (OPRE), an online dataset-compression algorithm that discards information through two explicit, input-space criteria. With a classifier that was randomly initialized at test time, OPRE's performance matches reported state-of-the-art online continual-learning methods on CIFAR 10 and CIFAR-100 without any pretrained feature extractor, and outperforms GDumb at an identical memory budget-while making only minimal and interpretable assumptions about the data to come. We frame these results as an empirical, information-theoretic perspective on continual learning.