LLM-based simulations can enable controlled studies of civic deliberation, but current systems lack speaker-attributed data and methods for evaluating long-form institutional behavior. ASR transcripts typically use anonymous labels such as Speaker_1, preventing models from learning stable participant behavior across meetings. We present a reproducible pipeline that converts public Zoom recordings into speaker-attributed transcripts enriched with persona profiles, topics, and pragmatic "action tags" such as [propose_motion]. Using this pipeline, we release three public datasets of government deliberation (Appellate Court hearings, School Board meetings, and Municipal Council sessions) and fine-tune LLM personas on this action-aware data. We evaluate simulations along four dimensions: persona fidelity, persona consistency, institutional fidelity, and behavioral coherence. Action-aware fine-tuning cuts perplexity by 67%, doubles classifier-based persona fidelity, increases vote attempts by up to 3.6\times, and improves deliberative responsiveness by up to 70%. Human evaluations show that simulated excerpts are often hard to distinguish from real deliberations, indicating a practical foundation for data-grounded civic simulation studies.
Point of Order: Action-Aware LLM Persona Modeling for Data-Grounded Civic Deliberation
LLM-based simulations can enable controlled studies of civic deliberation, but current systems lack speaker-attributed data and methods for evaluating long-form institutional behavior.
- Preview

- Year
- 2025
- Hosting
- Full text hostedCC-BY-4.0
Cite
Notes
Only stored in your browser.
Attribution
- Abstract & full text
- arxiv.org/abs/2511.17813CC-BY-4.0
- TL;DR
- Semantic Scholar