0

Agreement Between Large Language Models and Human Raters in Essay Scoring: A Research Synthesis

Despite the growing promise of large language models (LLMs) in automated essay scoring (AES), empirical findings regarding their reliability compared to human raters remain mixed.

Open
Year
2026
ArXiv
arxiv.org/abs/2512.14561
URL
arxiv.org/abs/2512.14561
Hosting
Abstract onlyARXIV-DEFAULT

Cite

Notes

Only stored in your browser.

Attribution

Abstract & full text
arxiv.org/abs/2512.14561ARXIV-DEFAULT
TL;DR
Semantic Scholar
Attribution policy →

Abstract

Despite the growing promise of large language models (LLMs) in automated essay scoring (AES), empirical findings regarding their reliability compared to human raters remain mixed. Following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, we synthesized 65 published and unpublished studies from January 2022 to August 2025 that examined agreement between LLM-generated scores and human ratings. Agreement levels varied substantially both across and within studies, with reported values spanning a wide range. Overall, the findings suggest that LLM-human agreement is highly context-dependent. Implications, challenges, and directions for future research are discussed.