0

Separating Oblivious and Adaptive Models of Variable Selection

Sparse recovery is among the most well-studied problems in learning theory and high-dimensional statistics. In this work, we investigate the statistical and computational landscapes of sparse recovery with $\ell_\infty$ error guarantees.

Preview
Year
2026
Hosting
Full text hostedCC-BY-4.0

Cite

Notes

Only stored in your browser.

Attribution

Abstract & full text
arxiv.org/abs/2602.16568CC-BY-4.0
TL;DR
Semantic Scholar
Attribution policy →

Abstract

Sparse recovery is among the most well-studied problems in learning theory and high-dimensional statistics. In this work, we investigate the statistical and computational landscapes of sparse recovery with \ell_\infty error guarantees. This variant of the problem is motivated by variable selection tasks, where the goal is to estimate the support of a k-sparse signal in \mathbb{R}^d. Our main contribution is a provable separation between the oblivious (for each'') and adaptive (for all'') models of \ell_\infty sparse recovery. We show that under an oblivious model, the optimal \ell_\infty error is attainable in near-linear time with \approx k\log d samples, whereas in an adaptive model, \gtrsim k^2 samples are necessary for any algorithm to achieve this bound. This establishes a surprising contrast with the standard \ell_2 setting, where \approx k \log d samples suffice even for adaptive sparse recovery. We conclude with a preliminary examination of a partially-adaptive model, where we show nontrivial variable selection guarantees are possible with \approx k\log d measurements.