Transformer models systematically favor certain token positions, yet the architectural origins of this position bias remain poorly understood. This bias is closely connected to the Lost-in-the-Middle phenomenon, where models underutilize information placed in the middle of the context. We show that Lost-in-the-Middle-type behavior can arise from the architecture of causal Transformers itself. To do so, we develop a structural theory of position bias based on residual-aware cumulative attention rollout. At finite depth, causal masking and residual connections induce broad, often U-shaped, influence profiles. At infinite depth, our framework resolves a discrepancy between prior attention-only collapse theory and practical Transformer behavior: residual connections fundamentally change cumulative attention dynamics. Empirically, the predicted profiles closely match measured input-token influence in pretrained language models.
A Structural Theory of Position Bias in Transformers
Transformer models systematically favor certain token positions, yet the architectural origins of this position bias remain poorly understood. This bias is closely connected to the Lost-in-the-Middle phenomenon, where models underutilize information placed in the middle of the…
- Year
- 2026
- Hosting
- Full text hostedCC-BY-4.0
Cite
Notes
Only stored in your browser.
Attribution
- Abstract & full text
- arxiv.org/abs/2602.16837CC-BY-4.0
- TL;DR
- Semantic Scholar