When Bigger is Worse: A Practitioner's Guide to Model Selection Under Data Scarcity

Scaling laws assume larger models trained on more data consistently outperform smaller ones -- an assumption that drives model selection in computer vision but remains untested in resource-constrained Earth observation (EO). We conduct a systematic efficiency analysis across three scaling dimensions: model size, dataset size, and input resolution, on rooftop photovoltaic (PV) detection in Madagascar, yielding 180 training runs across 60 configurations. Optimizing for model efficiency (mAP_{50} per unit of model size), we find a consistent efficiency inversion: YOLO11N achieves the highest efficiency (22\times higher than YOLO11X) with no accuracy penalty: it reaches the second highest absolute mAP_{50} (0.459), outperforming all models except YOLO11S by a margin smaller than run-to-run variance, directly contradicting the scaling prior. Resolution is the dominant resource allocation lever: moving from 416 px to 1280 px at 10 % of the data matches the efficiency gain of collecting the full dataset at low resolution. These findings are robust to the deployment objective: small high-resolution configurations are Pareto-dominant across all 60 experimental setups in the joint accuracy-throughput space, leaving no tradeoff to resolve. In data-scarce EO, the scaling prior does not just fail: it inverts.