Stabilizing Bandits using Regularization: Precise Regret and A Quantitative Central Limit Theorem

Statistical inference with bandit data presents fundamental challenges owing to adaptive sampling, which violates the independence assumptions underlying classical asymptotic theory. Recent work has identified stability \citep{laiwei82} as a sufficient condition for valid inference under adaptivity. This paper first provides a refined stability condition, stated in terms of the iterates of an online algorithm, and shows that a large class of regularized stochastic-mirror-descent-style algorithms satisfy it. This refined condition allows us to strengthen the asymptotic results of \citet{laiwei82} in several ways. First, we derive a non-asymptotic Berry--Esseen bound for the empirical reward estimates under adaptive sampling. Second, we derive matching non-asymptotic upper and lower bounds on the regret of the proposed algorithm, yielding a precise characterization of its regret. Third, we show that these regularized algorithms preserve asymptotic normality and valid inference under a prescribed level of adversarial corruption. Finally, we show that regularization is necessary rather than incidental: Lai--Wei stability is incompatible with the optimal O(\sqrt{T}) regret rate -- the rate attained by unregularized algorithms such as EXP3 -- so that a controlled, polylogarithmic inflation in regret is the price of valid inference.