HumorRank: A Tournament-Based Leaderboard for Evaluating Humor Generation in Large Language Models

Humor remains difficult to evaluate in large language models (LLMs) because what makes a response funny is subjective, comparative, and shaped by interacting comedic mechanisms rather than a single scalar property. Existing humor evaluation protocols therefore tend to produce isolated scores or task-specific judgments that are difficult to compare across models. We introduce HumorRank, a tournament-based framework for ranking textual humor generation through theory-grounded pairwise preference judgments. Across SemEval-2026 MWAHAHA and Humor Transfer Bench, HumorRank evaluates nine proprietary, open-weight, and specialized models using LLM-based comparative judgments informed by the General Theory of Verbal Humor (GTVH), with tournament aggregation yielding global rankings via Bradley-Terry estimation. The resulting rankings are cross-judge stable: independent Llama and Qwen LLM judges achieve Kendall τ = 0.889 on both benchmarks. The leaderboard reveals clear model stratification, showing that strong humor generation depends not only on scale but on mastery of comedic mechanisms such as incongruity, conciseness, escalation, and absurdity. HumorRank provides a scalable and interpretable methodology for benchmarking LLM-generated humor without relying solely on isolated automatic metrics or limited human evaluation.