Deconstructing Superintelligence: Identity, Self-Modification and Différance

Self-modification is routinely treated as constitutive of artificial superintelligence (SI), yet modification is a relative action requiring a supplement outside the operation. We formalise this on an associative operator algebra A with update operator \hat U, difference operator \hat D, and self-representation operator \hat R, identifying the supplement with \operatorname{Comm}(\hat U). A propagation theorem shows [\hat U,\hat R] decomposes through [\hat U,\hat D], so non-commutation propagates to self-representation. The liar paradox is the rank-one case [\hat T,Π_L]=0, and class A systems, in which \hat U acts on \hat D, reproduce it at system scale, yielding a structure coinciding with Priest's inclosure schema and Derrida's différance. Our results show that the strong self-modification taken to define superintelligence may undermine the persistent identity upon which such systems are premised.