Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) replaces human preference labels with executable reward functions such as math answer checkers, JSON tool-call validators, and code unit-test harnesses. That makes the reward partly a software artifact: if the verifier is wrong, optimization can learn the bug. We study this failure mode with a lightweight verifier-fuzzing framework that generates adversarial completions, compares buggy and stricter reference verifiers, logs paired decisions, and reports false-positive, false-negative, disagreement, exploit, and uncertainty metrics.
Before the Model Learns the Bug:Fuzzing RLVR Verifiers
Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) replaces human preference labels with executable reward functions such as math answer checkers, JSON tool-call validators, and code unit-test harnesses.
- Preview

- Year
- 2026
- Hosting
- Full text hostedCC-BY-4.0
Cite
Notes
Only stored in your browser.
Attribution
- Abstract & full text
- arxiv.org/abs/2606.01066CC-BY-4.0
- TL;DR
- Semantic Scholar