0

TOPSIS-RAD: Ranking According to Desires

Traditional TOPSIS derives its reference points -- the Positive Ideal Solution ($PIS$) and Negative Ideal Solution ($NIS$) -- from the observed alternative set, making rankings susceptible to misalignment with decision-maker (DM) requirements, sensitivity to outlier…

Open
Preview
Year
2026
ArXiv
arxiv.org/abs/2606.07253
Hosting
Full text hostedCC-BY-4.0

Cite

Notes

Only stored in your browser.

Attribution

Abstract & full text
arxiv.org/abs/2606.07253CC-BY-4.0
TL;DR
Semantic Scholar
Attribution policy →

Abstract

Traditional TOPSIS derives its reference points -- the Positive Ideal Solution (PIS) and Negative Ideal Solution (NIS) -- from the observed alternative set, making rankings susceptible to misalignment with decision-maker (DM) requirements, sensitivity to outlier performances, and rank reversal. This paper proposes TOPSIS-RAD, which addresses these issues by incorporating two arrays of DM-defined reference levels. Vetoed Performance Levels (VPL) exclude non-viable alternatives before normalisation, preventing them from distorting the ranking frontiers. Desired Performance Levels (DPL) cap performances at the DM's desired level before normalisation, anchoring the PIS in explicit aspirations rather than dataset extremes. Three toy examples demonstrate each mechanism: VPL reshapes normalisation boundaries by removing a non-viable alternative; fixed DPL frontiers stabilise rankings by limiting the influence of performances well above the desired level. The method preserves the familiar distance-based structure of TOPSIS while grounding the ranking in stable, DM-specified boundaries. Limitations and future research directions are also discussed.