Existing methods for testing deep neural networks (DNNs) primarily prioritize test inputs likely to reveal model faults under a fixed labeling budget. In practice, choosing that budget is difficult: too little testing misses failures, while too much incurs unnecessary labeling costs. This work studies the stopping problem in DNN testing. We formulate testing as a cost--benefit decision process in which labeling an input incurs cost c and discovering a fault yields value v. Based on this formulation, we introduce AdaStop, a framework that estimates the marginal fault discovery rate during testing and stops labeling when the estimated rate falls below the threshold τ= c/v. Experiments across multiple datasets, architectures, and selection strategies show that 65--84% of faults can be discovered using only 9--31% of the labeling budget.
AdaStop: Cost-Aware Early Stopping for DNN Test Selection
Existing methods for testing deep neural networks (DNNs) primarily prioritize test inputs likely to reveal model faults under a fixed labeling budget. In practice, choosing that budget is difficult: too little testing misses failures, while too much incurs unnecessary labeling…
- Preview

- Year
- 2026
- Hosting
- Abstract onlyARXIV-DEFAULT
Cite
Notes
Only stored in your browser.
Attribution
- Abstract & full text
- arxiv.org/abs/2607.05461ARXIV-DEFAULT
- TL;DR
- Semantic Scholar