Self-supervised learning matches supervised accuracy from a fraction of the labels, but the labeled-sample efficiency behind this has lacked a theoretical explanation. We provide one. Data augmentation induces a similarity graph on the unlabeled data, so downstream learning on that graph is graph-Laplacian-regularized learning. We prove a fast transductive rate, O(1/n_L) in the number of labels, in place of the supervised O(1/\sqrt{n_L}), by carrying the leave-one-out stability apparatus of Johnson and Zhang (JMLR 2007) over to the augmentation graph, and without the unrealistic assumptions of limit-based analyses (exact kernel, generalizing features). The bound makes augmentation quality explicit: the expected error is at most C/n_L + R_{DA}(y), where the data-augmentation alignment error R_{DA}(y) is the graph-cut mass of augmentations that cross a label boundary, so good augmentations let few labels suffice. The analysis uses a streamlined loss that drops the projector, negative-sample, and orthogonality overhead of standard objectives yet still recovers the top-K ideal features in the infinite-data limit, the augmentation-kernel eigenspace studied by Zhai et al. The result explains the observed accuracy-versus-label-count curve rather than only bounding a generalization gap.
Fast Rates for Semi-Supervised Learning via Data-Augmentation Graph Regularization
Self-supervised learning matches supervised accuracy from a fraction of the labels, but the labeled-sample efficiency behind this has lacked a theoretical explanation. We provide one.
- Preview

- Year
- 2026
- Hosting
- Abstract onlyARXIV-DEFAULT
Cite
Notes
Only stored in your browser.
Attribution
- Abstract & full text
- arxiv.org/abs/2607.07513ARXIV-DEFAULT
- TL;DR
- Semantic Scholar