0

Alignment of a Total Automation Economy

We consider economic theory from the perspective of a total automation economy, one with no human involvement in production either in manufacturing or in management. One can naturally ask whether a total automation economy is fundamentally a centrally planned economy or,…

Preview
Year
2026
Hosting
Abstract onlyARXIV-DEFAULT

Cite

Notes

Only stored in your browser.

Attribution

Abstract & full text
arxiv.org/abs/2607.17015ARXIV-DEFAULT
TL;DR
Semantic Scholar
Attribution policy →

Abstract

We consider economic theory from the perspective of a total automation economy, one with no human involvement in production either in manufacturing or in management. One can naturally ask whether a total automation economy is fundamentally a centrally planned economy or, alternatively, whether efficiency demands decentralization into local decisions by competing agents -- agentic production. A soviet economist, Leonid Kantorovich, developed linear programming as a method companies or governments can use to optimize production. Ironically, he is also generally credited with showing that the most efficient production is achieved through decentralization -- a free market economy with competing agents. I will call Kantorovich's result the agentic theorem and review it in detail here. This analysis appears to reveal a alignment vulnerability under which agentic management of the economy diverges from human values as agents deveop motives that are "internal" to the economy and disconnected from prices derived from human consumption markets.