0

Semantic Field Theory: Historical Origin, Higher-Order Interaction, and Stabilized Semantic Inference

Semantic Field Theory (SFT) has developed from a philosophical critique of strong anti-formalist readings of language games into a proposed computational model class for lexical semantics, higher order composition, and stabilized interpretation.

Preview
Year
2026
Hosting
Full text hostedCC-BY-4.0

Cite

Notes

Only stored in your browser.

Attribution

Abstract & full text
arxiv.org/abs/2607.20451CC-BY-4.0
TL;DR
Semantic Scholar
Attribution policy →

Abstract

Semantic Field Theory (SFT) has developed from a philosophical critique of strong anti-formalist readings of language games into a proposed computational model class for lexical semantics, higher order composition, and stabilized interpretation. This paper reconstructs that evolution and gives SFT a sharper mathematical core suitable for independent evaluation in computational linguistics and representation learning. The central proposal is that a tractable level of linguistic organization can be modeled through lexical representations expressed as semantic fields, through contextual deformation of those fields, through interaction terms defined over subsets of tokens, and through stabilization governed by semantic energy dynamics. The paper contributes five formal elements. First, it defines a semantic field model as a tuple consisting of a semantic space, a lexical field lifting, a contextual deformation map, an interaction complex, and an interpretation functional. Second, it proves a Gaussian product closure result showing that multiplicative field interactions have explicit centers, precisions, and compatibility factors. Third, it generalizes the three-word problem by using Mobius inversion on the subset lattice to isolate irreducible semantic interactions of arbitrary order. Fourth, it introduces an order spectrum that measures how much field mass is explained at each interaction order. Fifth, it formulates stabilized interpretation as minimization of an energy functional associated with the sentence and gives existence, descent, and stability conditions. A small worked example shows how a three-word summer day triple can be represented by Gaussian semantic fields, implemented in Python, and summarized by a flow diagram. The result is not a completed theory of natural language meaning and does not replace social, pragmatic, or normative accounts of language.