0

ChiEngMixBench: Evaluating Large Language Models on Expert-Style Chinese-English Terminology Mixing

Large language models increasingly mediate multilingual professional communication, where useful generation requires adapting to community conventions about which expressions are retained, translated, or mixed.

Preview
Year
2026
Hosting
Abstract onlyARXIV-DEFAULT

Cite

Notes

Only stored in your browser.

Attribution

Abstract & full text
arxiv.org/abs/2601.16217ARXIV-DEFAULT
TL;DR
Semantic Scholar
Attribution policy →

Abstract

Large language models increasingly mediate multilingual professional communication, where useful generation requires adapting to community conventions about which expressions are retained, translated, or mixed. Existing benchmarks rarely isolate such community-conditioned choices. We introduce ChiEngMixBench, a controlled benchmark for Chinese AI/CS discourse, where Chinese frames routinely incorporate established English technical terms. Built from public technical discussions, it contains 1,706 source-derived candidate pairs covering 1,344 non-empty normalized terms, including a 1,167-pair strict subset that fixes the Chinese prefix and syntactic position while varying only the terminology form. The benchmark combines paired likelihood comparisons with a transparent reference-profile diagnostic for open-ended responses. Across nine open-weight models, Chinese equivalents receive higher likelihood on most pairs, revealing a gap between source-attested usage and model preference. Specialized terms show a small directional lift that is not robust after frequency and length controls and multiple-comparison correction. Human evaluation and baseline analyses show that reference-profile conformity is informative under the intended mixed-style rubric but does not reliably predict holistic response preference. ChiEngMixBench provides a reusable testbed for community-specific multilingual conventions with explicit diagnostic boundaries.