Large language models (LLMs) have shown impressive results while requiring little or no direct supervision. Further, there is mounting evidence that LLMs may have potential in information-seeking scenarios. We believe the ability of an LLM to attribute the text that it generates is likely to be crucial in this setting. We formulate and study Attributed QA as a key first step in the development of attributed LLMs. We propose a reproducible evaluation framework for the task and benchmark a broad set of architectures. We take human annotations as a gold standard and show that a correlated automatic metric is suitable for development. Our experimental work gives concrete answers to two key questions (How to measure attribution?, and How well do current state-of-the-art methods perform on attribution?), and give some hints as to how to address a third (How to build LLMs with attribution?).
Attributed Question Answering: Evaluation and Modeling for Attributed Large Language Models
Attributed QA is studied as a critical step in developing LLMs with text attribution, with a benchmark framework and evaluation using human annotations and automatic metrics.
- Year
- 2022
- Venue
- arXiv 2022
- Authors
- 22
- Hosting
- Abstract onlyARXIV-DEFAULT
Cite
Notes
Only stored in your browser.
Attribution
- Abstract & full text
- arxiv.org/abs/2212.08037v2ARXIV-DEFAULT
- TL;DR
- Semantic Scholar
Abstract
Authors
22Jonathan HerzigRoee AharoniDonald MetzlerDaniel AndorLivio Baldini SoaresJianmo NiTal SchusterVinh Q. TranKai HuiJacob EisensteinMichael CollinsDipanjan DasWilliam W. CohenJi MaTom KwiatkowskiBernd BohnetPat VergaMassimiliano CiaramitaKuzman GanchevLierni Sestorain SaraleguiSlav PetrovKellie Webster