Automated summary quality assessment falls into two categories: reference-based and reference-free. Reference-based metrics, historically deemed more accurate due to the additional information provided by human-written references, are limited by their reliance on human input. In this paper, we hypothesize that the comparison methodologies used by some reference-based metrics to evaluate a system summary against its corresponding reference can be effectively adapted to assess it against its source document, thereby transforming these metrics into reference-free ones. Experimental results support this hypothesis. After being repurposed reference-freely, the zero-shot BERTScore using the pretrained DeBERTa-large-MNLI model of <0.5B parameters consistently outperforms its original reference-based version across various aspects on the SummEval and Newsroom datasets. It also excels in comparison to most existing reference-free metrics and closely competes with zero-shot summary evaluators based on GPT-3.5.
DocAsRef: An Empirical Study on Repurposing Reference-Based Summary Quality Metrics Reference-Freely
Repurposing reference-based metrics to be reference-free improves their performance in summary quality assessment, with zero-shot BERTScore outperforming its original version and other reference-free metrics.
- Year
- 2022
- Venue
- arXiv 2022
- Authors
- 8
- Hosting
- Abstract onlyARXIV-DEFAULT
Cite
Notes
Only stored in your browser.
Attribution
- Abstract & full text
- arxiv.org/abs/2212.10013v2ARXIV-DEFAULT
- TL;DR
- Semantic Scholar