0

Explaining Image Classifiers by Counterfactual Generation

The approach samples plausible infills using a generative model to identify image regions that most influence a classifier's decision, producing more compact and relevant saliency maps with fewer artifacts compared to ad-hoc methods.

Year
2018
Venue
explaining-image-classifiers-by-1
Authors
4
Hosting
Abstract onlyARXIV-DEFAULT

Cite

Notes

Only stored in your browser.

Attribution

Abstract & full text
arxiv.org/abs/1807.08024v3ARXIV-DEFAULT
TL;DR
Semantic Scholar
Attribution policy →

Abstract

When an image classifier makes a prediction, which parts of the image are relevant and why? We can rephrase this question to ask: which parts of the image, if they were not seen by the classifier, would most change its decision? Producing an answer requires marginalizing over images that could have been seen but weren't. We can sample plausible image in-fills by conditioning a generative model on the rest of the image. We then optimize to find the image regions that most change the classifier's decision after in-fill. Our approach contrasts with ad-hoc in-filling approaches, such as blurring or injecting noise, which generate inputs far from the data distribution, and ignore informative relationships between different parts of the image. Our method produces more compact and relevant saliency maps, with fewer artifacts compared to previous methods.

Authors

4