Neuromorphic computing shows promise for advancing computing efficiency and capabilities of AI applications using brain-inspired principles. However, the neuromorphic research field currently lacks standardized benchmarks, making it difficult to accurately measure technological advancements, compare performance with conventional methods, and identify promising future research directions. Prior neuromorphic computing benchmark efforts have not seen widespread adoption due to a lack of inclusive, actionable, and iterative benchmark design and guidelines. To address these shortcomings, we present NeuroBench: a benchmark framework for neuromorphic computing algorithms and systems. NeuroBench is a collaboratively-designed effort from an open community of researchers across industry and academia, aiming to provide a representative structure for standardizing the evaluation of neuromorphic approaches. The NeuroBench framework introduces a common set of tools and systematic methodology for inclusive benchmark measurement, delivering an objective reference framework for quantifying neuromorphic approaches in both hardware-independent (algorithm track) and hardware-dependent (system track) settings. In this article, we outline tasks and guidelines for benchmarks across multiple application domains, and present initial performance baselines across neuromorphic and conventional approaches for both benchmark tracks. NeuroBench is intended to continually expand its benchmarks and features to foster and track the progress made by the research community.
NeuroBench: A Framework for Benchmarking Neuromorphic Computing Algorithms and Systems
A collaborative benchmark suite, NeuroBench, is introduced to establish standardized evaluation criteria for neuromorphic computing, addressing the lack of clear benchmarks in this field.
- Year
- 2023
- Venue
- arXiv 2023
- Authors
- 100
- Hosting
- Abstract onlyARXIV-DEFAULT
Cite
Notes
Only stored in your browser.
Attribution
- Abstract & full text
- arxiv.org/abs/2304.04640v5ARXIV-DEFAULT
- TL;DR
- Semantic Scholar
Abstract
Authors
100Samuel SchmidgallTao SunJeremy ForestDenis KleykoPriyadarshini PandaWilliam GilpinClemens JS SchaeferSiddharth JoshiJason EshraghianJason YikKorneel Van den BergheDouwe den BlankenYounes BouhadjarMaxime FabrePaul HueberWeijie KeMina A KhoeiNoah Pacik-NelsonAlessandro PierroPhilipp StratmannPao-Sheng Vincent SunGuangzhi TangShenqi WangBiyan ZhouSoikat Hasan AhmedGeorge Vathakkattil JosephBenedetto LetoAurora MicheliAnurag Kumar MishraGregor LenzZergham AhmedMahmoud AklBrian AndersonAndreas G. AndreouChiara BartolozziArindam BasuPetrut BogdanSander BohteSonia BuckleyGert CauwenberghsElisabetta ChiccaFederico CorradiGuido de CroonAndreea DanielescuAnurag DaramMike DaviesYigit DemiragTobias FischerVittorio FraSteve FurberP. Michael FurlongAditya GilraHector A. GonzalezGiacomo IndiveriVedant KariaLyes KhacefJames C. KnightLaura KrienerRajkumar KubendranDhireesha KudithipudiShih-Chii LiuYao-Hong LiuHaoyuan MaRajit ManoharJosep Maria Margarit-TauléChristian MayrKonstantinos MichmizosDylan R. MuirEmre NeftciThomas NowotnyFabrizio OttatiAyca OzcelikkaleJongkil ParkMelika PayvandChristian PehleMihai A. PetroviciChristoph PoschAlpha RennerYulia SandamirskayaAndré van SchaikJohannes SchemmelCatherine SchumanJae-sun SeoSadique SheikSumit Bam ShresthaManolis SifalakisAmos SironiKenneth StewartMatthew StewartTerrence C. StewartJonathan TimcheckNergis TömenGianvito UrgeseMarian VerhelstCraig M. VineyardBernhard VoggingerAmirreza YousefzadehFatima Tuz ZohoraCharlotte FrenkelVijay Janapa Reddi