0

MindGames: Targeting Theory of Mind in Large Language Models with Dynamic Epistemic Modal Logic

Dynamic epistemic logic is used to generate complex Theory of Mind problems, and findings show that scaling language models does not always improve performance, despite GPT-4's enhanced epistemic reasoning.

Year
2023
Venue
arXiv 2023
Authors
2
Hosting
Abstract onlyARXIV-DEFAULT

Cite

Notes

Only stored in your browser.

Attribution

Abstract & full text
arxiv.org/abs/2305.03353v2ARXIV-DEFAULT
TL;DR
Semantic Scholar
Attribution policy →

Abstract

Theory of Mind (ToM) is a critical component of intelligence but its assessment remains the subject of heated debates. Prior research applied human ToM assessments to natural language processing models using either human-created standardized tests or rule-based templates. However, these methods primarily focus on simplistic reasoning and require further validation. Here, we leverage dynamic epistemic logic to isolate a particular component of ToM and to generate controlled problems. We also introduce new verbalization techniques to express these problems in English natural language. Our findings indicate that some language model scaling (from 70M to 6B and 350M to 174B) does not consistently yield results better than random chance. While GPT-4 demonstrates superior epistemic reasoning capabilities, there is still room for improvement. Our code and datasets are publicly available (https://huggingface.co/datasets/sileod/mindgames , https://github.com/sileod/llm-theory-of-mind )

Authors

2