Theory of Mind (ToM) is a critical component of intelligence but its assessment remains the subject of heated debates. Prior research applied human ToM assessments to natural language processing models using either human-created standardized tests or rule-based templates. However, these methods primarily focus on simplistic reasoning and require further validation. Here, we leverage dynamic epistemic logic to isolate a particular component of ToM and to generate controlled problems. We also introduce new verbalization techniques to express these problems in English natural language. Our findings indicate that some language model scaling (from 70M to 6B and 350M to 174B) does not consistently yield results better than random chance. While GPT-4 demonstrates superior epistemic reasoning capabilities, there is still room for improvement. Our code and datasets are publicly available (https://huggingface.co/datasets/sileod/mindgames , https://github.com/sileod/llm-theory-of-mind )
MindGames: Targeting Theory of Mind in Large Language Models with Dynamic Epistemic Modal Logic
Dynamic epistemic logic is used to generate complex Theory of Mind problems, and findings show that scaling language models does not always improve performance, despite GPT-4's enhanced epistemic reasoning.
- Year
- 2023
- Venue
- arXiv 2023
- Authors
- 2
- Hosting
- Abstract onlyARXIV-DEFAULT
Cite
Notes
Only stored in your browser.
Attribution
- Abstract & full text
- arxiv.org/abs/2305.03353v2ARXIV-DEFAULT
- TL;DR
- Semantic Scholar