0

INSTRUCTSCORE: Explainable Text Generation Evaluation with Finegrained Feedback

InstructScore, an explainable text generation metric leveraging human instruction and LLaMA, outperforms unsupervised metrics and matches state-of-the-art performance.

Year
2023
Venue
arXiv 2023
Authors
7
Hosting
Abstract onlyARXIV-DEFAULT

Cite

Notes

Only stored in your browser.

Attribution

Abstract & full text
arxiv.org/abs/2305.14282v3ARXIV-DEFAULT
TL;DR
Semantic Scholar
Attribution policy →

Abstract

Automatically evaluating the quality of language generation is critical. Although recent learned metrics show high correlation with human judgement, these metrics can not explain their verdict or associate the scores with defects in generated text. To address this limitation, we present InstructScore, an explainable evaluation metric for text generation. By harnessing both explicit human instruction and the implicit knowledge of GPT-4, we fine-tune a text evaluation metric based on LLaMA, producing both a score for generated text and a human readable diagnostic report. We evaluate InstructScore on a variety of generation tasks, including translation, captioning, data-to-text and commonsense generation. Experiments show that our 7B model surpasses all other unsupervised metrics, including those based on 175B GPT-3 and GPT-4. Surprisingly, our InstructScore, even without direct supervision from human-rated data, achieves performance levels on par with state-of-the-art metrics like COMET22, which were fine-tuned on human ratings.

Authors

7