While there has been a growing research interest in developing out-of-distribution (OOD) detection methods, there has been comparably little discussion around how these methods should be evaluated. Given their relevance for safe(r) AI, it is important to examine whether the basis for comparing OOD detection methods is consistent with practical needs. In this work, we take a closer look at the go-to metrics for evaluating OOD detection, and question the approach of exclusively reducing OOD detection to a binary classification task with little consideration for the detection threshold. We illustrate the limitations of current metrics (AUROC & its friends) and propose a new metric - Area Under the Threshold Curve (AUTC), which explicitly penalizes poor separation between ID and OOD samples. Scripts and data are available at https://github.com/glhr/beyond-auroc
Beyond AUROC & co. for evaluating out-of-distribution detection performance
This work examines the limitations of current OOD detection evaluation metrics and proposes a new metric, AUTC, that explicitly penalizes poor separation between in-distribution and out-of-distribution samples.
- Year
- 2023
- Venue
- arXiv 2023
- Authors
- 3
- Hosting
- Abstract onlyARXIV-DEFAULT
Cite
Notes
Only stored in your browser.
Attribution
- Abstract & full text
- arxiv.org/abs/2306.14658ARXIV-DEFAULT
- TL;DR
- Semantic Scholar