Large Language Models (LLMs) have lately been on the spotlight of researchers, businesses, and consumers alike. While the linguistic capabilities of such models have been studied extensively, there is growing interest in investigating them as cognitive subjects. In the present work I examine GPT-3 and ChatGPT capabilities on an limited-data inductive reasoning task from the cognitive science literature. The results suggest that these models' cognitive judgements are not human-like.
LLM Cognitive Judgements Differ From Human
GPT-3 and ChatGPT exhibit sub-human cognitive judgments in a limited-data inductive reasoning task from cognitive science literature.
- Year
- 2023
- Venue
- arXiv 2023
- Authors
- 1
- Hosting
- Abstract onlyARXIV-DEFAULT
Cite
Notes
Only stored in your browser.
Attribution
- Abstract & full text
- arxiv.org/abs/2307.11787v2ARXIV-DEFAULT
- TL;DR
- Semantic Scholar