0

Automatically Correcting Large Language Models: Surveying the landscape of diverse self-correction strategies

A review of automated self-correction techniques for large language models to address hallucination, unfaithful reasoning, and toxic content, categorized by training-time, generation-time, and post-hoc correction.

Year
2023
Venue
arXiv 2023
Authors
6
Hosting
Abstract onlyARXIV-DEFAULT

Cite

Notes

Only stored in your browser.

Attribution

Abstract & full text
arxiv.org/abs/2308.03188v2ARXIV-DEFAULT
TL;DR
Semantic Scholar
Attribution policy →

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable performance across a wide array of NLP tasks. However, their efficacy is undermined by undesired and inconsistent behaviors, including hallucination, unfaithful reasoning, and toxic content. A promising approach to rectify these flaws is self-correction, where the LLM itself is prompted or guided to fix problems in its own output. Techniques leveraging automated feedback -- either produced by the LLM itself or some external system -- are of particular interest as they are a promising way to make LLM-based solutions more practical and deployable with minimal human feedback. This paper presents a comprehensive review of this emerging class of techniques. We analyze and taxonomize a wide array of recent work utilizing these strategies, including training-time, generation-time, and post-hoc correction. We also summarize the major applications of this strategy and conclude by discussing future directions and challenges.

Authors

6