Medical systematic reviews can be very costly and resource intensive. We explore how Large Language Models (LLMs) can support and be trained to perform literature screening when provided with a detailed set of selection criteria. Specifically, we instruction tune LLaMA and Guanaco models to perform abstract screening for medical systematic reviews. Our best model, Bio-SIEVE, outperforms both ChatGPT and trained traditional approaches, and generalises better across medical domains. However, there remains the challenge of adapting the model to safety-first scenarios. We also explore the impact of multi-task training with Bio-SIEVE-Multi, including tasks such as PICO extraction and exclusion reasoning, but find that it is unable to match single-task Bio-SIEVE's performance. We see Bio-SIEVE as an important step towards specialising LLMs for the biomedical systematic review process and explore its future developmental opportunities. We release our models, code and a list of DOIs to reconstruct our dataset for reproducibility.
Bio-SIEVE: Exploring Instruction Tuning Large Language Models for Systematic Review Automation
LLMs, particularly instruction-tuned LLaMA and Guanaco models, perform better than traditional approaches in abstract screening for medical systematic reviews, though challenges remain in safety-first scenarios.
- Year
- 2023
- Venue
- arXiv 2023
- Authors
- 7
- Hosting
- Abstract onlyARXIV-DEFAULT
Cite
Notes
Only stored in your browser.
Attribution
- Abstract & full text
- arxiv.org/abs/2308.06610ARXIV-DEFAULT
- TL;DR
- Semantic Scholar