0

Response: Emergent analogical reasoning in large language models

Experiments show that GPT-3 fails to solve letter string analogies presented as zero-shot reasoning problems, questioning the evidence of emergent analogical reasoning in large language models.

Year
2023
Venue
arXiv 2023
Authors
2
Hosting
Abstract onlyARXIV-DEFAULT

Cite

Notes

Only stored in your browser.

Attribution

Abstract & full text
arxiv.org/abs/2308.16118v2ARXIV-DEFAULT
TL;DR
Semantic Scholar
Attribution policy →

Abstract

In their recent Nature Human Behaviour paper, "Emergent analogical reasoning in large language models," (Webb, Holyoak, and Lu, 2023) the authors argue that "large language models such as GPT-3 have acquired an emergent ability to find zero-shot solutions to a broad range of analogy problems." In this response, we provide counterexamples of the letter string analogies. In our tests, GPT-3 fails to solve simplest variations of the original tasks, whereas human performance remains consistently high across all modified versions. Zero-shot reasoning is an extraordinary claim that requires extraordinary evidence. We do not see that evidence in our experiments. To strengthen claims of humanlike reasoning such as zero-shot reasoning, it is important that the field develop approaches that rule out data memorization.

Authors

2