In their recent Nature Human Behaviour paper, "Emergent analogical reasoning in large language models," (Webb, Holyoak, and Lu, 2023) the authors argue that "large language models such as GPT-3 have acquired an emergent ability to find zero-shot solutions to a broad range of analogy problems." In this response, we provide counterexamples of the letter string analogies. In our tests, GPT-3 fails to solve simplest variations of the original tasks, whereas human performance remains consistently high across all modified versions. Zero-shot reasoning is an extraordinary claim that requires extraordinary evidence. We do not see that evidence in our experiments. To strengthen claims of humanlike reasoning such as zero-shot reasoning, it is important that the field develop approaches that rule out data memorization.
Response: Emergent analogical reasoning in large language models
Experiments show that GPT-3 fails to solve letter string analogies presented as zero-shot reasoning problems, questioning the evidence of emergent analogical reasoning in large language models.
- Year
- 2023
- Venue
- arXiv 2023
- Authors
- 2
- Hosting
- Abstract onlyARXIV-DEFAULT
Cite
Notes
Only stored in your browser.
Attribution
- Abstract & full text
- arxiv.org/abs/2308.16118v2ARXIV-DEFAULT
- TL;DR
- Semantic Scholar