0

Flesch or Fumble? Evaluating Readability Standard Alignment of Instruction-Tuned Language Models

Open-source instruction-tuned language models exhibit varying effectiveness in story completion and narrative simplification tasks compared to globally recognized models like ChatGPT.

Year
2023
Venue
arXiv 2023
Authors
2
Hosting
Abstract onlyARXIV-DEFAULT

Cite

Notes

Only stored in your browser.

Attribution

Abstract & full text
arxiv.org/abs/2309.05454v2ARXIV-DEFAULT
TL;DR
Semantic Scholar
Attribution policy →

Abstract

Readability metrics and standards such as Flesch Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL) and the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) exist to guide teachers and educators to properly assess the complexity of educational materials before administering them for classroom use. In this study, we select a diverse set of open and closed-source instruction-tuned language models and investigate their performances in writing story completions and simplifying narratives--tasks that teachers perform--using standard-guided prompts controlling text readability. Our extensive findings provide empirical proof of how globally recognized models like ChatGPT may be considered less effective and may require more refined prompts for these generative tasks compared to other open-sourced models such as BLOOMZ and FlanT5--which have shown promising results.

Authors

2