0

Large Language Model for Science: A Study on P vs. NP

LLMs, using Socratic reasoning, generate a proof schema and engage in rigorous dialogue to address the P vs. NP problem, aligning with existing research.

Preview
Year
2023
Venue
arXiv 2023
Authors
7
Hosting
Abstract onlyARXIV-DEFAULT

Cite

Notes

Only stored in your browser.

Attribution

Abstract & full text
arxiv.org/abs/2309.05689ARXIV-DEFAULT
TL;DR
Semantic Scholar
Attribution policy →

Abstract

In this work, we use large language models (LLMs) to augment and accelerate research on the P versus NP problem, one of the most important open problems in theoretical computer science and mathematics. Specifically, we propose Socratic reasoning, a general framework that promotes in-depth thinking with LLMs for complex problem-solving. Socratic reasoning encourages LLMs to recursively discover, solve, and integrate problems while facilitating self-evaluation and refinement. Our pilot study on the P vs. NP problem shows that GPT-4 successfully produces a proof schema and engages in rigorous reasoning throughout 97 dialogue turns, concluding "P \neq NP", which is in alignment with (Xu and Zhou, 2023). The investigation uncovers novel insights within the extensive solution space of LLMs, shedding light on LLM for Science.

Authors

7