0

Hardest Monotone Functions for Evolutionary Algorithms

The study introduces a function Switching Dynamic BinVal (SDBV) that challenges the $(1+1)$-EA in optimization and demonstrates it as the drift-minimizing dynamic monotone function within the PO-EA model.

Year
2023
Venue
arXiv 2023
Authors
4
Hosting
Abstract onlyARXIV-DEFAULT

Cite

Notes

Only stored in your browser.

Attribution

Abstract & full text
arxiv.org/abs/2311.07438ARXIV-DEFAULT
TL;DR
Semantic Scholar
Attribution policy →

Abstract

The study of hardest and easiest fitness landscapes is an active area of research. Recently, Kaufmann, Larcher, Lengler and Zou conjectured that for the self-adjusting $(1,\lambda)$-EA, Adversarial Dynamic BinVal (ADBV) is the hardest dynamic monotone function to optimize. We introduce the function Switching Dynamic BinVal (SDBV) which coincides with ADBV whenever the number of remaining zeros in the search point is strictly less than $n/2$, where $n$ denotes the dimension of the search space. We show, using a combinatorial argument, that for the $(1+1)$-EA with any mutation rate $p \in [0,1]$, SDBV is drift-minimizing among the class of dynamic monotone functions. Our construction provides the first explicit example of an instance of the partially-ordered evolutionary algorithm (PO-EA) model with parameterized pessimism introduced by Colin, Doerr and F'erey, building on work of Jansen. We further show that the $(1+1)$-EA optimizes SDBV in $\Theta(n^{3/2})$ generations. Our simulations demonstrate matching runtimes for both static and self-adjusting $(1,\lambda)$ and $(1+\lambda)$-EA. We further show, using an example of fixed dimension, that drift-minimization does not equal maximal runtime.

Authors

4