0

MedIAnomaly: A comparative study of anomaly detection in medical images

A benchmark is established with unified comparison for 30 typical anomaly detection methods using seven medical datasets, investigating the effects of key components and addressing evaluation challenges in medical anomaly detection.

Year
2024
Venue
arXiv 2024
Authors
4
Hosting
Abstract onlyARXIV-DEFAULT

Cite

Notes

Only stored in your browser.

Attribution

Abstract & full text
arxiv.org/abs/2404.04518v2ARXIV-DEFAULT
TL;DR
Semantic Scholar
Attribution policy →

Abstract

Anomaly detection (AD) aims at detecting abnormal samples that deviate from the expected normal patterns. Generally, it can be trained merely on normal data, without a requirement for abnormal samples, and thereby plays an important role in the recognition of rare diseases and health screening in the medical domain. Despite the emergence of numerous methods for medical AD, we observe a lack of a fair and comprehensive evaluation, which causes ambiguous conclusions and hinders the development of this field. To address this problem, this paper builds a benchmark with unified comparison. Seven medical datasets with five image modalities, including chest X-rays, brain MRIs, retinal fundus images, dermatoscopic images, and histopathology whole slide images, are curated for extensive evaluation. Thirty typical AD methods, including reconstruction and self-supervised learning-based methods, are involved in comparison of image-level anomaly classification and pixel-level anomaly segmentation. Furthermore, for the first time, we formally explore the effect of key components in existing methods, clearly revealing unresolved challenges and potential future directions. The datasets and code are available at \url{https://github.com/caiyu6666/MedIAnomaly}.

Authors

4