The disconnect between tokenizer creation and model training in language models allows for specific inputs, such as the infamous SolidGoldMagikarp token, to induce unwanted model behaviour. Although such `glitch tokens', tokens present in the tokenizer vocabulary but that are nearly or entirely absent during model training, have been observed across various models, a reliable method to identify and address them has been missing. We present a comprehensive analysis of Large Language Model tokenizers, specifically targeting this issue of detecting under-trained tokens. Through a combination of tokenizer analysis, model weight-based indicators, and prompting techniques, we develop novel and effective methods for automatically detecting these problematic tokens. Our findings demonstrate the prevalence of such tokens across a diverse set of models and provide insights into improving the efficiency and safety of language models.
Fishing for Magikarp: Automatically Detecting Under-trained Tokens in Large Language Models
A systematic approach is developed to detect under-trained and untrained tokens in LLMs by analyzing tokenizers, model weights, and using prompting techniques, highlighting their prevalence and suggesting ways to enhance model safety.
- Year
- 2024
- Venue
- arXiv 2024
- Authors
- 2
- Hosting
- Abstract onlyARXIV-DEFAULT
Cite
Notes
Only stored in your browser.
Attribution
- Abstract & full text
- arxiv.org/abs/2405.05417v2ARXIV-DEFAULT
- TL;DR
- Semantic Scholar