0

Understanding "Democratization" in NLP and ML Research

The study analyzes the use of "democratization" in NLP and ML research, highlighting a disconnect between ease of access and deeper democratic theories, advocating for more theoretical grounding.

Year
2024
Venue
arXiv 2024
Authors
4
Hosting
Abstract onlyARXIV-DEFAULT

Cite

Notes

Only stored in your browser.

Attribution

Abstract & full text
arxiv.org/abs/2406.11598v2ARXIV-DEFAULT
TL;DR
Semantic Scholar
Attribution policy →

Abstract

Recent improvements in natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning (ML) and increased mainstream adoption have led to researchers frequently discussing the "democratization" of artificial intelligence. In this paper, we seek to clarify how democratization is understood in NLP and ML publications, through large-scale mixed-methods analyses of papers using the keyword "democra*" published in NLP and adjacent venues. We find that democratization is most frequently used to convey (ease of) access to or use of technologies, without meaningfully engaging with theories of democratization, while research using other invocations of "democra*" tends to be grounded in theories of deliberation and debate. Based on our findings, we call for researchers to enrich their use of the term democratization with appropriate theory, towards democratic technologies beyond superficial access.

Authors

4