0

LIONs: An Empirically Optimized Approach to Align Language Models

The study investigates the impact of various design choices across different stages of language model training, including supervised fine-tuning, offline preference learning, and online preference learning, leading to models that outperform commercially tuned counterparts.

Year
2024
Venue
arXiv 2024
Authors
4
Hosting
Abstract onlyARXIV-DEFAULT

Cite

Notes

Only stored in your browser.

Attribution

Abstract & full text
arxiv.org/abs/2407.06542v2ARXIV-DEFAULT
TL;DR
Semantic Scholar
Attribution policy →

Abstract

Alignment is a crucial step to enhance the instruction-following and conversational abilities of language models. Despite many recent work proposing new algorithms, datasets, and training pipelines, there is a lack of comprehensive studies measuring the impact of various design choices throughout the whole training process. We first conduct a rigorous analysis over a three-stage training pipeline consisting of supervised fine-tuning, offline preference learning, and online preference learning. We have found that using techniques like sequence packing, loss masking in SFT, increasing the preference dataset size in DPO, and online DPO training can significantly improve the performance of language models. We then train from Gemma-2b-base and LLama-3-8b-base, and find that our best models exceed the performance of the official instruct models tuned with closed-source data and algorithms. Our code and models can be found at \url{https://github.com/Columbia-NLP-Lab/LionAlignment}.

Authors

4