0

A Survey on Benchmarks of Multimodal Large Language Models

A comprehensive review of 180 benchmarks evaluates Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) across perception, understanding, reasoning, specific domains, key capabilities, and other modalities, highlighting limitations and future directions in evaluation methods.

Year
2024
Venue
arXiv 2024
Authors
14
Hosting
Abstract onlyARXIV-DEFAULT

Cite

Notes

Only stored in your browser.

Attribution

Abstract & full text
arxiv.org/abs/2408.08632v2ARXIV-DEFAULT
TL;DR
Semantic Scholar
Attribution policy →

Abstract

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) are gaining increasing popularity in both academia and industry due to their remarkable performance in various applications such as visual question answering, visual perception, understanding, and reasoning. Over the past few years, significant efforts have been made to examine MLLMs from multiple perspectives. This paper presents a comprehensive review of 200 benchmarks and evaluations for MLLMs, focusing on (1)perception and understanding, (2)cognition and reasoning, (3)specific domains, (4)key capabilities, and (5)other modalities. Finally, we discuss the limitations of the current evaluation methods for MLLMs and explore promising future directions. Our key argument is that evaluation should be regarded as a crucial discipline to support the development of MLLMs better. For more details, please visit our GitHub repository: https://github.com/swordlidev/Evaluation-Multimodal-LLMs-Survey.

Authors

14