0

Stance Prediction and Claim Verification: An Arabic Perspective

This study evaluates textual entailment for claim verification and stance prediction in Arabic using a new corpus, demonstrating that pretraining improves stance prediction but not claim verification due to the lack of contextual evidence.

Year
2020
Venue
stance-prediction-and-claim-verification-an-1
Authors
1
Hosting
Abstract onlyARXIV-DEFAULT

Cite

Notes

Only stored in your browser.

Attribution

Abstract & full text
arxiv.org/abs/2005.10410ARXIV-DEFAULT
TL;DR
Semantic Scholar
Attribution policy →

Abstract

This work explores the application of textual entailment in news claim verification and stance prediction using a new corpus in Arabic. The publicly available corpus comes in two perspectives: a version consisting of 4,547 true and false claims and a version consisting of 3,786 pairs (claim, evidence). We describe the methodology for creating the corpus and the annotation process. Using the introduced corpus, we also develop two machine learning baselines for two proposed tasks: claim verification and stance prediction. Our best model utilizes pretraining (BERT) and achieves 76.7 F1 on the stance prediction task and 64.3 F1 on the claim verification task. Our preliminary experiments shed some light on the limits of automatic claim verification that relies on claims text only. Results hint that while the linguistic features and world knowledge learned during pretraining are useful for stance prediction, such learned representations from pretraining are insufficient for verifying claims without access to context or evidence.

Authors

1