0

signwriting-evaluation: Effective Sign Language Evaluation via SignWriting

This paper presents a suite of evaluation metrics specifically designed for SignWriting, addressing challenges in evaluating signs and continuous signing.

Year
2024
Venue
arXiv 2024
Authors
3
Hosting
Abstract onlyARXIV-DEFAULT

Cite

Notes

Only stored in your browser.

Attribution

Abstract & full text
arxiv.org/abs/2410.13668ARXIV-DEFAULT
TL;DR
Semantic Scholar
Attribution policy →

Abstract

The lack of automatic evaluation metrics tailored for SignWriting presents a significant obstacle in developing effective transcription and translation models for signed languages. This paper introduces a comprehensive suite of evaluation metrics specifically designed for SignWriting, including adaptations of standard metrics such as \texttt{BLEU} and \texttt{chrF}, the application of \texttt{CLIPScore} to SignWriting images, and a novel symbol distance metric unique to our approach. We address the distinct challenges of evaluating single signs versus continuous signing and provide qualitative demonstrations of metric efficacy through score distribution analyses and nearest-neighbor searches within the SignBank corpus. Our findings reveal the strengths and limitations of each metric, offering valuable insights for future advancements using SignWriting. This work contributes essential tools for evaluating SignWriting models, facilitating progress in the field of sign language processing. Our code is available at \url{https://github.com/sign-language-processing/signwriting-evaluation}.

Authors

3