Large language models (LLMs) augmented with retrieval systems have demonstrated significant potential in handling knowledge-intensive tasks. However, these models often struggle with unfaithfulness issues, generating outputs that either ignore the retrieved context or inconsistently blend it with the LLMs parametric knowledge. This issue is particularly severe in cases of knowledge conflict, where the retrieved context conflicts with the models parametric knowledge. While existing faithful RAG approaches enforce strict context adherence through well-designed prompts or modified decoding strategies, our analysis reveals a critical limitation: they achieve faithfulness by forcibly suppressing the models parametric knowledge, which undermines the models internal knowledge structure and increases the risk of misinterpreting the context. To this end, this paper proposes FaithfulRAG, a novel framework that resolves knowledge conflicts by explicitly modeling discrepancies between the model`s parametric knowledge and retrieved context. Specifically, FaithfulRAG identifies conflicting knowledge at the fact level and designs a self-thinking process, allowing LLMs to reason about and integrate conflicting facts before generating responses. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our method outperforms state-of-the-art methods. The code is available at https:// github.com/DeepLearnXMU/Faithful-RAG
FaithfulRAG: Fact-Level Conflict Modeling for Context-Faithful Retrieval-Augmented Generation
FaithfulRAG addresses knowledge conflict in LLMs by explicitly modeling and resolving discrepancies between parametric knowledge and retrieved context.
- Year
- 2025
- Venue
- arXiv 2025
- Authors
- 7
- Hosting
- Abstract onlyARXIV-DEFAULT
Cite
Notes
Only stored in your browser.
Attribution
- Abstract & full text
- arxiv.org/abs/2506.08938ARXIV-DEFAULT
- TL;DR
- Semantic Scholar