0

Hearing to Translate: The Effectiveness of Speech Modality Integration into LLMs

Hearing to Translate benchmarks SpeechLLMs and cascaded systems for speech-to-text translation, finding that cascaded systems are more reliable overall and highlighting the importance of integrating LLMs for high-quality translation.

Year
2025
Venue
arXiv 2025
Authors
11
Hosting
Abstract onlyARXIV-DEFAULT

Cite

Notes

Only stored in your browser.

Attribution

Abstract & full text
arxiv.org/abs/2512.16378ARXIV-DEFAULT
TL;DR
Semantic Scholar
Attribution policy →

Abstract

As Large Language Models (LLMs) expand beyond text, integrating speech as a native modality has given rise to SpeechLLMs, which aim to translate spoken language directly, thereby bypassing traditional transcription-based pipelines. Whether this integration improves speech-to-text translation quality over established cascaded architectures, however, remains an open question. We present Hearing to Translate, the first comprehensive test suite rigorously benchmarking 5 state-of-the-art SpeechLLMs against 16 strong direct and cascade systems that couple leading speech foundation models (SFM), with multilingual LLMs. Our analysis spans 16 benchmarks, 13 language pairs, and 9 challenging conditions, including disfluent, noisy, and long-form speech. Across this extensive evaluation, we find that cascaded systems remain the most reliable overall, while current SpeechLLMs only match cascades in selected settings and SFMs lag behind both, highlighting that integrating an LLM, either within the model or in a pipeline, is essential for high-quality speech translation.

Authors

11