Existing long-horizon memory benchmarks mostly use multi-turn dialogues or synthetic user histories, which makes retrieval performance an imperfect proxy for person understanding. We present \BenchName, a publicly releasable benchmark built from long-form autobiographical narratives, where actions, context, and inner thoughts provide dense evidence for inferring stable motivations and decision principles. \BenchName~reconstructs each narrative into a flashback-aware, time-anchored stream and evaluates models with evidence-linked questions spanning factual recall, subjective state attribution, and principle-level reasoning. Across diverse narrative sources, retrieval-augmented systems mainly improve factual accuracy, while errors persist on temporally grounded explanations and higher-level inferences, highlighting the need for memory mechanisms beyond retrieval. Our data is in KnowMeBench{https://github.com/QuantaAlpha/KnowMeBench}.
KnowMe-Bench: Benchmarking Person Understanding for Lifelong Digital Companions
Long-horizon memory benchmarks based on autobiographical narratives evaluate models' ability to infer stable motivations and decision principles through evidence-linked questions spanning factual recall, subjective state attribution, and principle-level reasoning.
- Year
- 2026
- Venue
- arXiv 2026
- Authors
- 11
- Hosting
- Abstract onlyARXIV-DEFAULT
Cite
Notes
Only stored in your browser.
Attribution
- Abstract & full text
- arxiv.org/abs/2601.04745ARXIV-DEFAULT
- TL;DR
- Semantic Scholar