0

Layer by layer, module by module: Choose both for optimal OOD probing of ViT

Intermediate layers in vision transformers provide better representations than final layers, with performance degradation due to distribution shifts between pretraining and downstream data, and optimal probing strategies depend on the magnitude of these shifts.

Year
2026
Venue
arXiv 2026
Authors
5
Hosting
Abstract onlyARXIV-DEFAULT

Cite

Notes

Only stored in your browser.

Attribution

Abstract & full text
arxiv.org/abs/2603.05280ARXIV-DEFAULT
TL;DR
Semantic Scholar
Attribution policy →

Abstract

Recent studies have observed that intermediate layers of foundation models often yield more discriminative representations than the final layer. While initially attributed to autoregressive pretraining, this phenomenon has also been identified in models trained via supervised and discriminative self-supervised objectives. In this paper, we conduct a comprehensive study to analyze the behavior of intermediate layers in pretrained vision transformers. Through extensive linear probing experiments across a diverse set of image classification benchmarks, we find that distribution shift between pretraining and downstream data is the primary cause of performance degradation in deeper layers. Furthermore, we perform a fine-grained analysis at the module level. Our findings reveal that standard probing of transformer block outputs is suboptimal; instead, probing the activation within the feedforward network yields the best performance under significant distribution shift, whereas the normalized output of the multi-head self-attention module is optimal when the shift is weak.

Authors

5