0

MentalBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating Psychiatric Diagnostic Capability of Large Language Models

MentalBench presents a psychiatric diagnostic evaluation benchmark using a DSM-5 grounded knowledge graph to assess LLMs' decision-making capabilities in clinical settings.

Year
2026
Venue
arXiv 2026
Authors
10
Hosting
Abstract onlyARXIV-DEFAULT

Cite

Notes

Only stored in your browser.

Attribution

Abstract & full text
arxiv.org/abs/2602.12871ARXIV-DEFAULT
TL;DR
Semantic Scholar
Attribution policy →

Abstract

We introduce MentalBench, a benchmark for evaluating psychiatric diagnostic decision-making in large language models (LLMs). Existing mental health benchmarks largely rely on social media data, limiting their ability to assess DSM-grounded diagnostic judgments. At the core of MentalBench is MentalKG, a psychiatrist-built and validated knowledge graph encoding DSM-5 diagnostic criteria and differential diagnostic rules for 23 psychiatric disorders. Using MentalKG as a golden-standard logical backbone, we generate 24,750 synthetic clinical cases that systematically vary in information completeness and diagnostic complexity, enabling low-noise and interpretable evaluation. Our experiments show that while state-of-the-art LLMs perform well on structured queries probing DSM-5 knowledge, they struggle to calibrate confidence in diagnostic decision-making when distinguishing between clinically overlapping disorders. These findings reveal evaluation gaps not captured by existing benchmarks.

Authors

10