Large language models (LLMs) enable strong text generation, and in general there is a practical tradeoff between fine-tuning and prompt engineering. We introduce Simplify-This, a comparative study evaluating both paradigms for text simplification with encoder-decoder LLMs across multiple benchmarks, using a range of evaluation metrics. Fine-tuned models consistently deliver stronger structural simplification, whereas prompting often attains higher semantic similarity scores yet tends to copy inputs. A human evaluation favors fine-tuned outputs overall. We release code, a cleaned derivative dataset used in our study, checkpoints of fine-tuned models, and prompt templates to facilitate reproducibility and future work.
Simplify-This: A Comparative Analysis of Prompt-Based and Fine-Tuned LLMs
A comparative analysis of fine-tuning and prompt engineering approaches for text simplification using encoder-decoder large language models shows that fine-tuned models provide better structural simplification while prompting achieves higher semantic similarity but with tendency to copy inputs.
- Year
- 2026
- Venue
- arXiv 2026
- Authors
- 4
- Hosting
- Abstract onlyARXIV-DEFAULT
Cite
Notes
Only stored in your browser.
Attribution
- Abstract & full text
- arxiv.org/abs/2601.05794ARXIV-DEFAULT
- TL;DR
- Semantic Scholar