Fr'echet Inception Distance (FID) is the primary metric for ranking models in data-driven generative modeling. While remarkably successful, the metric is known to sometimes disagree with human judgement. We investigate a root cause of these discrepancies, and visualize what FID "looks at" in generated images. We show that the feature space that FID is (typically) computed in is so close to the ImageNet classifications that aligning the histograms of Top-$N$ classifications between sets of generated and real images can reduce FID substantially -- without actually improving the quality of results. Thus, we conclude that FID is prone to intentional or accidental distortions. As a practical example of an accidental distortion, we discuss a case where an ImageNet pre-trained FastGAN achieves a FID comparable to StyleGAN2, while being worse in terms of human evaluation.
The Role of ImageNet Classes in Fréchet Inception Distance
The Fr\'echet Inception Distance (FID) metric, while successful, can mismatch human judgement due to its reliance on ImageNet classification features, leading to accidental distortions in model ranking.
- Year
- 2022
- Venue
- arXiv 2022
- Authors
- 5
- Hosting
- Abstract onlyARXIV-DEFAULT
Cite
Notes
Only stored in your browser.
Attribution
- Abstract & full text
- arxiv.org/abs/2203.06026v3ARXIV-DEFAULT
- TL;DR
- Semantic Scholar