We present a benchmark suite of four datasets for evaluating the fairness of pre-trained language models and the techniques used to fine-tune them for downstream tasks. Our benchmarks cover four jurisdictions (European Council, USA, Switzerland, and China), five languages (English, German, French, Italian and Chinese) and fairness across five attributes (gender, age, region, language, and legal area). In our experiments, we evaluate pre-trained language models using several group-robust fine-tuning techniques and show that performance group disparities are vibrant in many cases, while none of these techniques guarantee fairness, nor consistently mitigate group disparities. Furthermore, we provide a quantitative and qualitative analysis of our results, highlighting open challenges in the development of robustness methods in legal NLP.
FairLex: A Multilingual Benchmark for Evaluating Fairness in Legal Text Processing
A benchmark suite evaluates fairness in pre-trained language models across different jurisdictions and fine-tuning techniques, revealing persistent performance disparities.
- Year
- 2022
- Venue
- ACL 2022 5
- Authors
- 6
- Hosting
- Abstract onlyARXIV-DEFAULT
Cite
Notes
Only stored in your browser.
Attribution
- Abstract & full text
- arxiv.org/abs/2203.07228ARXIV-DEFAULT
- TL;DR
- Semantic Scholar