0

Structure-Informed Estimation for Pilot-Limited MIMO Channels via Tensor Decomposition

Accurate channel state information in wideband MIMO systems is constrained by pilot overhead, a challenge intensifying as bandwidths scale toward 6G. This paper proposes a structure-informed hybrid estimator formulating pilot-limited MIMO channel estimation as low-rank tensor…

Preview
Year
2026
Hosting
Abstract onlyARXIV-DEFAULT

Cite

Notes

Only stored in your browser.

Attribution

Abstract & full text
arxiv.org/abs/2602.04083ARXIV-DEFAULT
TL;DR
Semantic Scholar
Attribution policy →

Abstract

Accurate channel state information in wideband MIMO systems is constrained by pilot overhead, a challenge intensifying as bandwidths scale toward 6G. This paper proposes a structure-informed hybrid estimator formulating pilot-limited MIMO channel estimation as low-rank tensor completion from sparse pilot observations---an underdetermined inverse problem that prior approaches avoid by assuming fully observed tensors. Canonical polyadic (CP) and Tucker decompositions are compared: CP excels for specular channels matching its rank-one parameterization exactly, while Tucker provides numerical stability at extreme pilot scarcity where CP exhibits heavy-tail divergence. A lightweight 3D U-Net learns residual components beyond the low-rank structure, compensating for diffuse scattering and hardware non-idealities. On synthetic specular channels, Tucker completion improves normalized mean-squared error (NMSE) by 10.88 dB over least squares and 7.83 dB over orthogonal matching pursuit at 10% pilot density (ρ); CP outperforms Tucker by 13.11 dB at SNR=20 dB. On DeepMIMO channels, the hybrid Tensor--NN estimator has two regimes: Tensor--NN(Tucker) remains stable at ρ=2% where CP diverges, while a CP-guided variant becomes best from ρ\ge 4%, reaching -16.44 dB at ρ=8% and -20.34 dB at ρ=20%. The Tucker-guided variant outperforms unconstrained deep learning across the full pilot range; the CP-guided variant widens this gap once stable. Empirical analysis confirms sample complexity scales with intrinsic channel dimensionality (dominant paths) rather than ambient tensor size.