Agent Skills are structured packages of procedural knowledge that augment LLM agents at inference time. Despite rapid adoption, there is no standard way to measure whether they actually help. We present SkillsBench, a benchmark of 86 tasks across 11 domains paired with curated Skills and deterministic verifiers. Each task is evaluated under three conditions: no Skills, curated Skills, and self-generated Skills. We test 7 agent-model configurations over 7,308 trajectories. Curated Skills raise average pass rate by 16.2 percentage points(pp), but effects vary widely by domain (+4.5pp for Software Engineering to +51.9pp for Healthcare) and 16 of 84 tasks show negative deltas. Self-generated Skills provide no benefit on average, showing that models cannot reliably author the procedural knowledge they benefit from consuming. Focused Skills with 2--3 modules outperform comprehensive documentation, and smaller models with Skills can match larger models without them.
SkillsBench: Benchmarking How Well Agent Skills Work Across Diverse Tasks
Agent Skills are structured packages of procedural knowledge that augment LLM agents at inference time.
- Year
- 2026
- Venue
- arXiv 2026
- Stars
- 1.3k
- Authors
- 40
- Hosting
- Abstract onlyARXIV-DEFAULT
Cite
Notes
Only stored in your browser.
Attribution
- Abstract & full text
- arxiv.org/abs/2602.12670ARXIV-DEFAULT
- TL;DR
- Semantic Scholar
Topics
1Abstract
Authors
40Yue ZhangSteven DillmannXin LanXuandong ZhaoYuanli WangDi WangXiangyi LiWenbo ChenYimin LiuShenghan ZhengXiaokun ChenYifeng HeYubo LiBingran YouHaotian ShenJiankai SunShuyi WangQunhong ZengRoey Ben ChaimZonglin DiYipeng GaoJunwei HeYizhuo HeLiqiang JingLuyang KongJiachen LiSonglin LiYijiang LiYueqian LinXinyi LiuXuanqing LiuHaoran LyuZe MaBowei WangRunhui WangTianyu WangWengao YeHanwen XingYiqi XueHan-chung Lee